You have no saved articles. Why don't you add some?
A recent spat in Taiwan’s legislature put a spotlight on the island’s “heritage languages.” But are proponents of linguistic diversity fighting for a lost cause?
Something went wrong. Error code 1.
This feature is only available for paying subscribers. You can continue reading without saving your preference, or you can subscribe now.
Already a subscriber? Log in here.
This feature is for paid subscribers only.
Copy this link
Something went wrong.
On September 27, Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱国正 Qiū Guózhèng) presented a report in the Legislative Yuan, Taiwan’s parliament, about the importance of developing long-range weapons. But then, when he came to be questioned by beleaguered legislator Chen Po-wei (陈伯惟 Chén Bówéi) of the deeply pro-independence Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP), the conversation shifted into something else entirely.
Chen asked his question in Hokkien, a language also known as “Taiwanese.” In eschewing Mandarin, Chen hoped to bring attention to the inauguration of the Legislative Yuan’s use of real-time interpreting services, a result of the Development of National Languages Act.
However, Chiu refused the service, asking a subordinate to translate instead. As Chen continued speaking in Taiwanese, Chiu became frustrated, telling Chen, “Language is a communication tool, if everyone can use the same tools, it will make things more convenient,” implying that Chen should use Mandarin, Taiwan’s lingua franca. A vexed Chen responded that he was only “protecting Taiwan’s mother tongue” and that Chiu was being “unreasonable.”
The incident immediately sparked debate over what role language should play in the development of Taiwanese democracy. After the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) took control of Taiwan in 1945, it began promoting Standard Mandarin as the “national language” (国语 guóyǔ). When Japan ruled the island, it imposed Japanese as the lingua franca, bringing the island’s relatively isolated ethnic groups into a common society.
After the beginning of martial law in 1949, the KMT began repressing other languages, including Taiwanese and Hakka, which were labeled as dialects, as well as indigenous languages. Media had to be in Mandarin, “dialects” were banned in schools, Bibles written in romanized Taiwanese were confiscated, and all state business was conducted in the national language.
After martial law ended and Taiwan democratized, an effort began to encourage the development of Taiwan’s heritage languages. Schools began teaching languages according to their students’ ethnic background. Broadcasting restrictions were relaxed. Cabinet-level commissions were created to govern Indigenous and Hakka affairs, with language policy as a key issue.
But the 40 years of martial law and imposed Mandarin hegemony has done extensive damage to Taiwan’s linguistic diversity. According to the 2020 census, only 7% of children ages 6 to 14 use Taiwanese as their primary language. In contrast, almost 66% of those over the age of 65 primarily speak Taiwanese. The situation is even worse for Hakka and Indigenous languages.
In 2019, the Legislative Yuan passed the Development of National Languages Act, which labeled all of Taiwan’s heritage languages as national languages and called for their official promotion by the government. This included measures like the establishment of government-funded TV stations for each of Taiwan’s languages, more resources for the development of language education, and the extension of “mother tongue” education to secondary school students.
But the passage of the law did not remedy all the problems of the past. The politics of language are intertwined with ethnic politics, which permeate Taiwanese society.
“Language is loaded with memory and bitterness,” says Shih Cheng-feng (施正锋 Shī Zhèngfēng), a professor at National Dong Hwa University.
“Behind the blue and green conflict lies ethnic divisions,” he adds, referring to the main political camps centered on the KMT and ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
According to Shih, Chen’s persistence in using Taiwanese revealed the existing ethnic tensions that persist in Taiwanese society, illustrating the continued grievances between locals (本土人 běntǔrén) and mainlanders (外省人 wàishěngrén), who came to Taiwan with the KMT after 1945 and imposed Mandarin on the population.
“Language is an important mobilization tool for the DPP [and other parties in its camp]. It consolidates groups,” Shih says. He believes that though Chen is technically a mainlander, his position as a legislator for arguably Taiwan’s most pro-independence party means he has to act like a “fighting chicken” to “show his loyalty.” This is critical for Chen, who must activate his base to save his job at a recall election on October 23.
After his spat with Chiu, Chen was inundated with criticism, primarily coming from the KMT camp. A user on PTT, a popular Taiwanese social media platform, criticized Chen for “earnestly making a show” of an important hearing. Another lamented, “Do we have to divide ethnic groups again?” Chao Shao-kang (赵少康 Zhào Shǎokāng), an important pro-KMT media figure, said that Chen had “wasted the people’s blood, sweat, and tears” with his antics. In a demonstration of the incident’s political saliency, both current KMT chairman Eric Chu (朱立伦 Zhū Lìlún) and former chairman Johnny Chiang (江启臣 Jiāng Qǐchén) said they would become more involved in the effort to recall Chen.
But Chen also had defenders. Lai Pin-yu (赖品妤 Lài Pǐnyú), a legislator for the DPP, said that Chen’s “good intentions had been muddied” by the opposition. Chen Feng-hui (陈丰惠 Chén Fēnghuì), director of the Lee Chiang-chiue Taiwanese Culture and Education Foundation, believes that Chen made a point to use Taiwanese because he and the TSP “want to bring attention to language and culture issues,” emphasizing that “Taiwanese language should have a place in politics.”
To Chen Feng-hui, defense minister Chiu’s refusal to use the interpretation function was strange. “He might not know, or think it’s important, that Taiwan is a culturally and linguistically diverse country,” she says. She believes that “the harms of the martial law period still persist,” with large sections of Taiwanese society still “brainwashed” into thinking having a common language is ideal.
“Local languages are our roots,” she says, an essential piece of Taiwanese identity.
The partisan reaction to Chen and Chiu’s outburst in the Legislative Yuan demonstrates the power of identity politics in contemporary Taiwan, and could indicate subtle changes in the country’s ethnic dynamics.
“Mainlanders feel relatively deprived now,” says Shih, the professor at National Dong Hwa University. “Before, they were the dominant group. After the democratic transition, they started to increasingly feel like they had nothing. Language, the dominance of Mandarin, is one of the last places they still feel superior.”
The transition toward a truly linguistically diverse society has had mixed results. While multiple DPP governments have championed linguistic diversity, they have also enacted policies that contradict this aim.
For example, the Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文 Cài Yīngwén) government’s 2030 Bilingual Country Policy (双语国家政策 shuāngyǔ guójiā zhèngcè) aimed to make English an official language with the equivalent status of Chinese. For Chen Feng-hui, the director of the Taiwanese language foundation, the policy signifies the government’s ignorance of the threat facing Taiwan’s local languages. Not only does it imply that Mandarin should be the language of officialdom, but it again makes other languages like Taiwanese, Hakka, and Indigenous secondary.
“Taiwanese speakers will vote for [the DPP],” says Chen Feng-hui, believing that the party has little incentive to prioritize language revitalization.
Shih, the professor at Dong Hwa University, agrees. “The DPP has ignored this issue because they want to replace mainlanders, not reform society,” he says. He believes that the existence of DPP party factions mirror KMT local factionalism, and the party’s promise 30 years ago that “ethnic differences will fade away” sounds very close to the KMT’s rigid Chinese nationalism.
As for Chen the legislator, it seems that his antics have not been well received in the broader pan-green camp. He and Chiu apologized to each other the next day, and various reports in the press indicated that important DPP leaders, while supporting Chen, had told him to tone down his rhetoric. An October 9 My Formosa poll found 37% of those asked supported recalling Chen, with only 25% opposed. Perhaps identity politics isn’t enough to save his electoral chances.
Professor Shih believes that for Taiwan to truly become a liberal, multicultural society, it must learn from other countries. He believes that the Canadian model, where both French and English hold the same national stature and localities have a high degree of autonomy in language policy, is worth considering in the Taiwanese context.
But others fear it may be too late.
“The Indigenous Peoples Commission says in 10 years their languages will be gone. The Hakka say in 20 years. We say 30 years for Taiwanese,” says Chen Feng-hui.
is a freelancer living in Taipei. He is a graduate of UC Davis with degrees in Political Science and Economics. His interest is in labor rights, minorities, and migration. Read more
Former U.S. Ambassador to China
Get Premium Access
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Performance cookies are key in allowing web site screens and content to load quickly on all types of devices.
|_gat||This cookies is installed by Google Universal Analytics to throttle the request rate to limit the colllection of data on high traffic sites.|
|YSC||This cookies is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos.|
Preference cookies are used to store user preferences to provide them with content that is customized accordingly. These cookies also allow for the viewing of embedded content, such as videos.
|bcookie||This cookie is set by linkedIn. The purpose of the cookie is to enable LinkedIn functionalities on the page.|
|lang||This cookie is used to store the language preferences of a user to serve up content in that stored language the next time user visit the website.|
|lidc||This cookie is set by LinkedIn and used for routing.|
|PugT||This cookie is set by pubmatic.com. The purpose of the cookie is to check when the cookies were last updated on the browser in order to limit the number of calls to the server-side cookie store.|
Analytics cookies help us understand how our visitors interact with the website. It helps us understand the number of visitors, where the visitors are coming from, and the pages they navigate. The cookies collect this data and report it anonymously.
|__gads||This cookie is set by Google and stored under the name dounleclick.com. This cookie is used to track how many times users see a particular advert which helps in measuring the success of the campaign and calculate the revenue generated by the campaign. These cookies can only be read from the domain that it is set on so it will not track any data while browsing through another sites.|
|_ga||This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site’s analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.|
|_gid||This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.|
|_omappvp||The cookie is set to identify new vs returning users. The cookie is used in conjunction with _omappvs cookie to determine whether a user is new or returning.|
|_omappvs||The cookie is used to in conjunction with the _omappvp cookies. If the cookies are set, the user is a returning user. If neither of the cookies are set, the user is a new user.|
|GPS||This cookie is set by Youtube and registers a unique ID for tracking users based on their geographical location|
Advertisement cookies help us provide our visitors with the most relevant ads and marketing campaigns.
|__qca||This cookie is associated with Quantcast and is used for collecting anonymized data to analyze log data from different websites to create reports that enables the website owners and advertisers provide ads for the appropriate audience segments.|
|_fbp||This cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.|
|everest_g_v2||The cookie is set under eversttech.net domain. The purpose of the cookie is to map clicks to other events on the client’s website.|
|fr||The cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.|
|IDE||Used by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.|
|mc||This cookie is associated with Quantserve to track anonymously how a user interact with the website.|
|personalization_id||This cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.|
|PUBMDCID||This cookie is set by pubmatic.com. The cookie stores an ID that is used to display ads on the users’ browser.|
|TDCPM||The cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.|
|TDID||The cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.|
|test_cookie||This cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the users’ browser supports cookies.|
|uid||This cookie is used to measure the number and behavior of the visitors to the website anonymously. The data includes the number of visits, average duration of the visit on the website, pages visited, etc. for the purpose of better understanding user preferences for targeted advertisments.|
|uuid||To optimize ad relevance by collecting visitor data from multiple websites such as what pages have been loaded.|
|uuidc||This cookie is used to stores information about how the user uses the website such as what pages have been loaded and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This data is used to provide users with relevant ads.|
|VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE||This cookie is set by Youtube. Used to track the information of the embedded YouTube videos on a website.|